Archive for the ‘1122. People’ Category.

Join Quoth Community!

Spotlight

Please feel free to join Quoth Community at: http://www.iquoth.org/community

About

Eleven years is passing, one by one iQuoth.org keeps progressing — this time the organization launched the Quoth Community website. Note that Quoth Community is another Connecting Practice program aimed to promote and foster the use of one or more modeling principles of practice generalization.

Community Features

Quoth Community is packed with many amazing features that makes a great way to connect you with practitioners to pass on knowledge. It is a place where it enables you to:

keep up with friends;
better interact with others;
innovate practice with others;
share information, materials, procedures, and/or tools with others;
express openly your experiences, beliefs, and/or emotions with others;
connect and communicate similar interests with others;
identify your development opportunities;
build your professional networks;
provide solution to problems;
open problems and/or issues;
provide general comments;
bring new ideas; and/or
so on.

Rewarding Programs

In reaching another milestone, iQuoth is providing points as one way to make the community alive marked by the activity contribution of practitioners. And recognizing, rewarding, and awarding the activity contribution of practitioners who gave valuable support to the Quoth Community website launch as such, awards below will be provided.

1. First 100 practitioners are given 2160 Hours (90 days) award for joining the community.
2. Next 150 after 100 practitioners are given 1440 Hours (60 days) award for joining the community.
3. Next 300 after 250 practitioners are given 720 Hours (30 days) award for joining the community.
4. Next 150 after 550 practitioners are given 528 Hours (22 days) award for joining the community.
5. Next 150 after 650 practitioners are given 360 Hours (15 days) award for joining the community.
6. Next 200 after 800 practitioners are given 168 Hours (7 days) award for joining the community.

Earned Hours can be used by means of coupon for posting a job at Quoth Jobs website. Below are advisories.

1. Awarding of Hours to selected practitioners through Quoth Community is from 1st of October 2011 to 31st of October 2011.
2. Coupon releases will be posted weekly beginning 1st of October 2011 in Quoth Community as part of News, Updates, and Announcements group activities.
3. Jobs posting with coupon will be accepted beginning 1st of October 2011.

Please watch out for more rewarding programs, such as:

Gift Items
Training
Seminars
Others

Get started with Quoth Community

Register now! To register, please click the create an account link at Quoth Community – bottom part of sidebar and sign up. Once you sign in, you can start exploring the community, inviting users to become friends, joining a group, and taking on the best of “what is” and/or “what could be” of Quoth Community.

Again, Please feel free to join Quoth Community and invite your friends too!

5 Step Process to Issue Development

Objective: To completely and clearly express the issues as support to current activity.

1. Formulate and understand what the issue in your specific piece of work is.

2. Describe the issue and/or observation. The reader should interpret the information presented in the issue statement characteristically with the following questions: What is the main point or expression that you are trying to convey to your reader (explain what you’re thinking about the issue – what the issue is)? Why you want to clarify (explain its importance to you and others)?

3. Provide materials and/or descriptive (prepared) screenshot(s) as evidence (data base) to serve (explain, support, and perpetuate the issue) as a sign or representation of the relationship established in the issue and explanation portions from Step 2 that conveys and verifies the existence and significance of the issue that you want to clarify for this issue.

4. Ask the issue-question.

5. Name of person who should support and review your issue.

6 Step Process to Concern Development

Objective: To completely and clearly express the concern as support to current activity.

1. Formulate and understand what the concern in your specific piece of work is.

2. Describe the setting and situation of the concern. The reader should interpret the information presented in the concern statement characteristically with the following questions: What is the main point or expression that you are trying to convey to your reader (explain what you’re thinking about the concern – what the concern is)? Why you want to address it (explain its importance to you and others)?

3. Provide materials and/or descriptive (prepared) screenshot(s) as evidence (data base) to serve (explain, support, and perpetuate the concern) as a sign or representation of the relationship established in the concern and explanation portions from Step 2 that conveys and verifies the existence and significance of the concern that you want to address for this concern.

4. Describe the expected condition (specific) that the subject of concern must have.

5. (Optional) List the resources needed to address your concern; e.g., person who can address the concern, equipment, supplies, printing, and so forth.

6. Name of person who should support and review your concern.

10-Step Process to Idea Development

Objective: To completely and clearly express the ideas as support to current program, event, or activity.

1. Formulate and understand what the idea in your specific piece of writing is.

2. Describe the idea. The reader should interpret the information presented in the idea statement characteristically with the following questions: What is the main point or expression that you are trying to convey to your reader (what the idea is – explain what you’re thinking about it)? Why you want to do it (explain its importance to you and others)? Who will benefit from it?

3. Provide descriptive, statistical, quantitative, qualitative, and/or examples as evidence (data base) to serve as a sign or representation of the relationship established in the idea and explanation portions from Step 2 that conveys and verifies the existence and significance of the problem/need that you want to solve or address for this idea. This covers facts, figures, and/or information needs and gaps. A Statement of Need can be based on the latest developments in one’s field, expert statements, or statistical documentation:

4. Describe the specific results you want to achieve (attainable and realistic) and include additional statements that define the expected outcomes in measurable terms (the objectives):

5. Develop a plan of action/approach that includes the activities or services you plan to provide in achieving these results:

6. List the resources needed to implement your idea; e.g., list of colleagues who will participate in the project and indicate their prospective roles, equipment, travel, supplies, printing, and so forth.

7. (Optional) The Timeframe for this project is from to :

8. (Optional) The estimated cost for this project is: $

9. Name the Supervisor who should support and review your idea.

10. (Optional) If you know of a possible funding source, please list: (For ideas about funding, click here.)

Note: In the idea development, choose information that will help to explain, support, and perpetuate the idea throughout the entire paper. The information that comprises your paper should always have a relationship to this idea. In other words, your paper should remind your reader, at every possible point, that there is a recurrent relationship between your idea and the information in each section. The idea functions like a seed through which your paper, and your ideas, will grow.

Join a Practitioner Group

The owner of Connecting Practice is positive that most people have a natural desire to learn, to share what they know, and to make things better. Yet, this natural desire is thwarted by disorder (hurdles and deterrents – a problem of cultural domination in learning, sharing, and improving our KM practice) that we erect in our organization.

The disorder includes:

1. A culture that values personal technical expertise and knowledge creation over knowledge sharing. This is rampant in engineering and knowledge-based organizations, such as consulting and research firms.

2. An organization who disintegrates into a group of isolated camps With little incentive or lack of need or responsibility to share KM knowledge and/or practice with others. They promote “silo” thinking and hoard KM knowledge and/or practice, in which locations, divisions, and functions focus on maximizing their own accomplishments and rewards. Their question, “why should I share my KM knowledge and/or practice?”

3. An organization who allows or rewards not the people for taking the time to learn and share and help each other to improve knowledge and skills.

4. A leader who demonstrates the “not-invented-here” syndrome – it is the lack of experience learning from outside one’s on group – or refuses to bring in new ideas committed to an obsolete KM practice which once made the group successful, but which now threatens to sink it. S/he is unable to innovate or even reinvent the KM practice.

5. People who lack of contact, relationships, and common perspectives among others who don’t work side-by-side. It creates interaction patterns with little incentive to cooperate, collaborate, share information, or team up to pursue mission-critical outcomes. In most organizations, the left hand not only doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, but it also may not even know there is a right hand.

If you have one or more of this disorder, the owner of Connecting Practice invites you to join the KM Practitioner Group and participate in discussing and sharing your free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics. By registering, it will involve and give you an opportunity to:

  • provide, solicit, model, recommend new, or question free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics;
  • feel, reflect, think, and take on the best of “what is” and/or “what could be” of free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics;
  • understand the unique conditions, interpretations, assumptions, and/or concerns of free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics;
  • express openly free KM practice material, procedure, tool, training, and/or metric information, experiences, ideas, beliefs, and/or emotions with others;
  • Point out certain free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics that have proven unworkable or that is unnecessary;
  • cope with free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics and/or in one progress initiative;
  • find our where present free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics are working or not;
  • provide general comments on free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics;
  • learn more about free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics they seek;
  • improve the usability of a free KM practice materials, procedures, tools, trainings, and/or metrics;
  • learn and understand what is going on in the forum;
  • build networks and solutions together;
  • provide solution to problems;
  • open problems and/or issues;
  • suggest for improvements;
  • tell positive stories;
  • learn collaboratively;
  • keep up with friends;
  • point out errors; and/or
  • so on.

To join, please click the Practitioner Group link in the main menu and register.

Register now and invite your friends too to help Connecting Practice to progress in the hope of arriving at a solution to disorder!

Software Development

How Can I Perform A Formal After Action Review In A Project?

After Action Review (AAR) is a tool that can enable others to provide constructive, directly actionable, and/or on-the-spot feedback in a non-threatening way within a process of participation, cooperation, and involvement.

Each time an incorrect performance is observed, it should be immediately corrected so that it will not interfere with future projects. During major projects, it is not always easy to notice incorrect performances. Indeed, in many cases, the correct performances will be unknown for these projects as they are learning projects for others. That is why the AAR should be planned at the end of each project so that others can be enabled to provide feedback; others can be given an opportunity to share their views, comments, suggestions, ideas, issues, and/or concerns; others can be enabled to understand why things happened during the progression of the process; others can be enabled to learn lessons and grow from their experience; and others can be enabled to identify innovation and/or generate solution, suggestions, and ideas for the improvement of their next project.

Guideline: Perform AAR after each project.

Climates:
1. Enabling participants to obtain mutual trust from each other.
2. Enabling participants to speak freely.
3. Enabling participants to give commitment to learning.
4. Enabling participants to have an innovative behavior as the norm.
5. Enabling participants to do the right thing.
6. Remind participants that problem solving should be pragmatic.
7. Remind participants that they should NOT be preoccupied with status, territory, or second guessing “what the leader will think.”

Responsible: Team Lead
1. Perform Risk Analysis to solve potential project stopping issue(s). Note that the lack of resource is one of the root of many other problems. Identifying and examining the risk(s) at the start of the project would avoid these problems before the team set off for the project.
2. Ask all participants to keep a note of problems, issues, and/or concerns that they encountered during the project. They should keep a note of successes as well as failures.
3. Prepare, plan, and appoint a facilitator (an independent person) to facilitate the AAR meeting. This includes identifying and re-affirming the need and/or purpose of the AAR meeting.

Responsible: Facilitator
4. After project release, establish the “ground truth” of the completed project by revisiting the objectives and deliverables of the project and sending email request to all participants a day before the AAR meeting asking them to list 10 successes, failures, and problems that occurred during the project. This includes choosing the participants and writing their position titles and responsibilities. The participants should provide the following information:

  • Project name
  • Name, position, and objective of person submitting the information
  • Function Name + [Success that was made (a brief statement of the identified task and/or activity that went well) + What were the intended results? + What were the actual results that answer why the identified task and/or activity went well? + Who's to credit for this? + Can other teams benefit from doing the same?]1:m
  • Function Name + [Failure that was made (a brief statement of the identified task and/or activity that went not ok) + What were the intended results? + What were the actual results? + Get explanations that answer why the identified task and/or activity were taken, why the failure happened, what caused the results, or why did the actual results happen that way? + Who's the owner for this? + What suggestion can be made? + Can other teams be affected from doing the same?]1:m
  • Function Name + [A brief statement of the identified task and/or activity affected by a problem? + Problem + Who's responsible for this? + Who should be responsible? + What's the identified root causes? Was it a gap in the process? + What's the identified solutions? + What is the consequence of not solving this problem? The worst consequence? Most probable? + Can other teams be affected from doing the same? + Escalation Point]1:m
  • Function Name + [a brief statement of the identified issues and/or concerns that surround the project for resolution]1:m

Note: The participants should ask their teams for feedback on the issues before completing the form.

5. Define scope of AAR meeting by documenting and/or putting together a list of the 10 most common successes, failures, and problems before the AAR meeting. Note that the information will form the AAR meeting agendas. This includes creating a list of probing open-ended questions, establishing the priority of the items, estimating the amount of time on each item, and if necessary, setting for limited discussion to arrive at the appropriateness of the selected items on the agenda.

6. Calling AAR meeting as soon as possible and inviting all the participants in advance. This includes determining time and location parameters for the AAR meeting and arranging for action minutes to be taken (minutes of the meeting) by one of the participants. Note that every effort should be made to get all of the participants into one room for the meeting. If this is not possible then video conferencing should be used. It is difficult to discuss sensitive issues when you can’t see the person you’re talking too.

7. At the getting started of the AAR meeting, give a short introduction, make announcements first and quickly, present the theme, and state the scope and other limitation.

Tips or Guidelines

  • Create the right climate that is one of trust, openness, and commitment to learning in the AAR meeting. Present some rules, if appropriate.
  • Make clear that the purpose of the AAR meeting is to help future projects run more smoothly by identifying the learning points from this project.

8. At the AAR meeting, share the information, summarize the key events, and/or decide to construct a flow chart of what happened.

9. In the failure discussion, explore the gap between the intended and actual results in order to identify causes and commit the team to a few key “sustains” and “improves” for the next cycle of the project. Brainstorm the “gaps” to generate worthwhile ideas from the theme to arrive on something that a group needs to understand better and make a decision about.

Tips or Guidelines for Facilitator

  • Ensure that everyone has an opportunity to contribute.
  • Strive to allow participants to offer previously unspoken issues and/or concerns by calling for questions, clarifications, and concerns.
  • Strive to allow participants to offer solutions, answers, insights, comments, and/or ideas rather than you offering them.
  • Remain unbiased throughout the AAR review.
  • Allow NOT blame and/or personal attacks.
  • Handle complaints positively.

Tips or Guidelines for Team Lead

  • Address issues and/or concerns from the point of view of what should have been done to make the situation better, what process should we change to ensure that this doesn’t happen again.

10. In the problem discussion, begin with presenting problem. Then allow the participants to brainstorm the problems to generate worthwhile solution from the theme to arrive on something that a group needs to understand better and make a decision about. Also allow the participants to evaluate and select solution and generate alternative solutions. Lastly, develop an action plan. Define the top 15 actions to be completed and identify who will do each action or who will delegate where necessary. Note that the top 15 action items should have dates agreed for when they will be completed. The remaining actions will be lower priority but the team should be aware that not completing these actions will cause problems on projects in the future.

11. In the success discussion, begin with presenting the report and things to the team what they can do well allowing them to reflect and think on impact of the project. Then ask ‘what the team could do better to improve the team’s performance as the team continue to work together?’ or ‘what needs improvement that the team could do better next time?’ Here you may explore alternative courses of actions that might have been more effective. This includes identifying issues and/or concerns that surround the theme for resolution.

12. Ask ‘what lessons can be learned from the experience?’ Here you may press participants for specific, repeatable advice that others could apply in similar situations.

13. At closure, ensure that everyone feels fully heard before leaving the AAR meeting. Here you may ask them for a numerical rating of the project: ‘looking back, how satisfied are you with the project: marks out of ten?’ Their answer would enable you to ask them, ‘what would have made it a ten for you?’ This includes appreciating any ideas that have come up and encouraging the participants to communicate more ideas that will come up with possibilities that work as they continue to ponder about the subject (failures, problems, issues, concerns, etc.).

14. [Optional] 1 hour should be scheduled at the end of the AAR meeting for an Executive Summary. A conference call will be held between the participants in the AAR review meeting and any other interested parties. The top 10 problems, 15 issues, and 15 action plan should be presented at this conference meeting.

15. Give closing comments and agreement on next steps. This includes announcing that a discussion must be continued in another meeting – a discussion extension with several options to address problems, issues, and/or concerns.

16. Record the AAR. Things like: Conclusions; lessons and guidelines for the future; some background information about the project to help put these guidelines into a meaningful context; the names of the people involved for future reference; and any key documents such as project plans or reports.

17. Share the completed document to all parties involved.

18. Follow-up on the top 15 action items and ensure that they are completed.

AAR is a working document and should evolve as others learn more from the AAR process. I am confident that you can develop your AAR knowledge and skills further in your field of expertise.

Quoth